
Welcome!
We're glad you are here. This is the place to ask for bag advice, help other people out, post reviews, and share photos and videos.
TOM BIHN Forums Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 15,086
Posts: 195,186
Members: 6,999
Active Members: 213
Welcome to our newest member, MikeJenkinson.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Thread: The Hero's Journey
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by tebnewyork View Post@moriond I was getting excited until the last picture with the cache.
When not in a cache the laptop fits fine with no bulge AND can be zipped on to the main backpack?
Yes, when my 13" Retina MacBook Pro is placed in the Top Pack with only it's hard shell, and no cache, I can put it flat into the Top Pack, including in the mode where the Top Pack is zipped to the HsJ, and it can be completely zipped up with no bulge.
In the last picture you're actually seeing the extreme case: I put it into the narrow pocket, with the rest of the Top Pack completely empty (so all parts around it could sag down), and where the unbalanced laptop in cache had the zippered edge on the floor, pressing up against the cache.
You could probably pack the laptop with cache into the large compartment where a slight angling could be tolerated without a bulge, but then this would also depend on what else you were packing there. Remember that according to the Dimensions of the Cache lined on its product page, not only does the exterior extend to 9.3" in width, it also extends to a depth of 1.3", and I've placed the laptop with cache in a compartment that is only about 1.5" depth -- not the main compartment that is 3 times deeper, where you'd have to wonder about how exactly I was inserting the laptop.
Most of the time I carry my 13" rMBP in a vertical cache in my Synapse. When I use a horizontal cache, it's usually on my 13" MacBook Air, and it's one of the older caches with denser foam and a more tightly woven fabric, that I prefer, but with no rails. (On top of that I can use the same cache on my 13" rMBP, and the older caches are a looser fit). So, for the photo sequence above, I actually dug out a current cache with rails designed for the 13" rMBP, and put it on the laptop.
They're not great pictures, because I've been pressed for time and found it hard to set up the shots with a taped in section of measuring tape, while holding the bag open, etc. before having to dash off. (Product debuts often don't match up with the schedule of other activities).
However, hopefully they'll give you enough information to make a decision -- including that last shot.
I haven't done a full pack-up of the HsJ with the laptop in the Top Pack. Remember that if you put heavy items in it (folders and papers along with the laptop) that it will be riding at the top of the bag when you carry everything attached together.
Once again, if I didn't really want to use the HsJ for trail-hiking, and were only doing business air travel, I would opt for another bag.
HTH
moriond
P.S. I note they sold the last Nordic Hero's Journey last night. Even as of yesterday afternoon, there was only 1 left in the inventory.
ETA: Pictures of the outside of the Top Pack of the HsJ with my 13" rMBP in its hard shell the (narrower) front compartment (but with no cache) Note that, as described in my earlier posts, a 13" rMBP in a clear hard shell, but with no surrounding cache, fits into the HsJ Top Pack with no bulges. I'm showing the side that normally gets zipped into the HsJ -- this is the smaller compartment into which I placed the 13" rMBP in a horizontal cache, and stood upright in my earlier picture. It's also the more constraining of the compartments.
I've had to push and tuck the bottom of the bag around the bottom of the laptop -- in order to show the front of the otherwise empty bag completely flat, I'd have to find a hard-cover A4 notebook from my office to exactly fill the rest of the compartment and lie underneath the Retina MacBook Pro. The ripples are not from stress, but from the fact that the laptop does not completely fill this compartment.
Here's the view from the top -- no bulges at all. The earlier pictures of the laptop in its clear, hard shell lying absolutely flat against both sides of both compartments are actually more revealing of the fact that you can fit it into the Top Pack without any strain on the outside fabric, but you can also use these shots to convince yourself.
Leave a comment:
-
@moriond I was getting excited until the last picture with the cache.
When not in a cache the laptop fits fine with no bulge AND can be zipped on to the main backpack?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moriond View Post
ETA: If you want to devote the smaller compartment entirely to your 13" rMBP, you can fit it with Horizontal Cache into that pocket. That's how close the tolerances are.
The HsJ Top Pack with a 13" rMBP inside a cache loaded into the front compartment. Bag is shown upside down so you can see how the extra height of the cache causes the Halcyon fabric to bulge. But, it is limited to that compartment. And the rest of the bag is empty in this picture. Sorry for the poor quality of the quick and dirty pictures.
moriond
BTW, It's a lot easier to illustrate these points and keep track of compartments with the Nordic HsJ than it would be with the all Black.Last edited by moriond; 09-29-2016, 12:36 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backpack View PostDear TB Crew, Mods or users who own a HJ, would you be kind enough to show pictures of the carry on bag unzipped bag with a DLBP or/and DLBC .
It is quite difficult to figure out the scale.
HsJ Top Pack beside DLBC. The height difference is not large, but the Top Pack of the HsJ cannot be taller than 9" if it is to both attach and meet carryon maximum dimensions. It is much deeper. The free side is about 4.75" deep, and the attached compartment is about 1.5" deep.
My 13" Retina MacBook Pro in hard shell sitting entirely flat within the smaller compartment of the Top Pack. (Obvious, because this is the Nordic side, and the compartment is 1.5" deep. The laptop takes up about 1" of the depth).
Another view of the 13" Retina MacBook Pro in hard shell sitting flat with the other side of the smaller compartment of the Top Pack.
My 13" Retina MacBook Pro in hard shell sitting flat in the larger compartment of the Top Pack -- which is still attached to the HsJ. This is a terrible picture because of trying to include a shot of a ruler and take the picture, too, in not the greatest lighting. The ruler is actually showing a bit short at about 4.5" to the bottom of the compartment. It's more like 4.75" and the 13" Retina MacBook Pro takes up 1" of that space.
Viewed from the other side (with Top Pack still attached to HsJ) there is about 3" depth from the bottom of this section to the zipper. 1" is occupied by the 13" rMBP, in its hard shell, and lying flat. The other zipped section is about 1.5"+.
Once again, as long as I place my 13" rMBP into the Top Pack with only the hard shell, I can put it in perfectly flat. And if you are willing to slightly angle your laptop in cache, you can also fit it into the Top Pack with the cache on.
HTH
moriond
ETA: If you want to devote the smaller compartment entirely to your 13" rMBP, you can fit it with Horizontal Cache into that pocket. That's how close the tolerances are.Last edited by moriond; 09-29-2016, 12:10 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backpack View PostI was thinking that the HJ, carry on, could be housing a windbreaker or a sweater in the back pocket of the Daylight Backpack.
I'll try to get you a comparison photo soon; maybe one of my colleagues will beat me to it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tebnewyork View Postit would be awesome if you would make a better waist strap to buy for the Aeronauts
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backpack View PostThose two are pretty light, I usually pack with 2 PCBP and 2 PCSB because It is easy to find stuff and I can't stand accidentally placing my clean clothes on the hotel surfaces.
If you use Aether Packing Cubes, which are very lightweight, you could place either the DLBP or DLBC in the main compartment, holding your MacBook Pro in its Cache.
Dear TB Crew, Mods or users who own a HJ, would you be kind enough to show pictures of the carry on bag unzipped bag with a DLBP or/and DLBC .
It is quite difficult to figure out the scale.
On one trip, I used a SCB as a Packing Cube because of the two bag limit, on a long trip, where I needed to take a small purse.
I was thinking that the HJ, carry on, could be housing a windbreaker or a sweater in the back pocket of the Daylight Backpack.
I love to go marsupial with my TB bags, it just mean I have TB accessories inside my smaller TB bags which I place inside bigger TB bags which one day could go in a Yeoman Duffel when I want to check in, because I am tired at the end of a trip. Or because I don't have time to do my pointillist packing technique because I need to bug out ahead of a flood or something.
Or, it is spontaneous road trip time! Yeah! On this one.
Darcy, it would be awesome if you would make a better waist strap to buy for the Aeronauts, Please consider.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tebnewyork View PostCame close on ordering but needed to figure out what i'd carry on a trip. My use would not be hiking. I saw a spiral notebook being a tight fit for the top pack. For me I'd need the top bag to hold a 13" MacBook Pro or I'd still need to take a DLBP or DLBC with me.
If you use Aether Packing Cubes, which are very lightweight, you could place either the DLBP or DLBC in the main compartment, holding your MacBook Pro in its Cache.
Dear TB Crew, Mods or users who own a HJ, would you be kind enough to show pictures of the carry on bag unzipped bag with a DLBP or/and DLBC .
It is quite difficult to figure out the scale.
On one trip, I used a SCB as a Packing Cube because of the two bag limit, on a long trip, where I needed to take a small purse.
I was thinking that the HJ, carry on, could be housing a windbreaker or a sweater in the back pocket of the Daylight Backpack.
I love to go marsupial with my TB bags, it just mean I have TB accessories inside my smaller TB bags which I place inside bigger TB bags which one day could go in a Yeoman Duffel when I want to check in, because I am tired at the end of a trip. Or because I don't have time to do my pointillist packing technique because I need to bug out ahead of a flood or something.
Or, it is spontaneous road trip time! Yeah! On this one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backpack View PostMore hints about the City Wonderfinder, please.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by brucep View Post......I'd also like to see how this handles when you don't fill it up.
Leave a comment:
-
It's a design in its own right, but just as cool as the Sprout.
Leave a comment:
-
I've had convertible travel packs in the past - a large Eagle Creek bag that I got for a trip to Europe 15+ years ago comes to mind, but I don't think it would be considered a carry-on by today's standards. It was heavy because I packed heavy back then and my trip was early Spring, so I was probably packed for cold weather. I still use the day pack that would zip onto the back of the main pack. I gave up the main pack after only a couple of trips because it was too heavy and beefy.
I have had lots of day and overnight/extended trail backpacks over the years, and two convertible shoulder bag/backpacks, including the A30 I'm currently using.
The HsJ has several advantages over the old Eagle Creek bag. Maybe stating the obvious for many. The top pack zipping to the "top" should be better weight distribution for backpacking. The size will meet US carry-on requirements. The multiple ways to configure the top pack is amazing! It's a great combo travel and trail design.
I was surprised this didn't weigh more - 4 lbs is not a lightweight backpack, but it has the heavy duty zippers and durable fabrics we would expect from Tom Bihn. For those forced to check, they can probably do that with confidence, although I'm sure some will want to put it in a duffel if they are planning to check.
Price - $480 as many have said is tough - the nonstarter for me. The ultralight trail pack that I drool over these days is $325 and weighs 21 oz using Dyneema® Composite Fabric Hybrids (formerly Cuben Fiber Hybrids). There are other good choices in the $200 range that are ~2lbs using Robic. But those are not travel packs - might not be carry-on friendly, and I would not check them unless they were in a sturdy duffel. I would like to do some backpacking outside of my driving range, but don't have any plans to currently, and probably won't take the HsJ unless it landed in my hands for a lot less.
I would go for a smaller lighter version. I really like the HsJ top pack, but it could strap/click into place. I would lighten up the heavy duty zippers, and lose the sleeping bag compartment zipper. Panel loading is probably a given with Tom Bihn, and a great features in travel bags, so I can live with the extra long zipper for that. I would like mesh size pockets and ideally a mesh back pocket. These could be modular (removable) if necessary, but I would consider mine for carry-on only. Maybe the panel flap could be invertable? (is that a word?) Main body could be smaller (maybe 2200 cu in / 36 liters). Ideally these changes would reduce the cost as well.
I applaud anyone jumping in with both feet and heading off to some distant trail (or hut/hostel/hotel) with the Hero's Journey. Looking forward to many beautiful pics.
Leave a comment:
-
Probably not going to be able to justify the HJ due the pretty high cost and the fact I already have 2 A45s and 2 A30s.
Leave a comment:
-
Wow. I'm quite impressed with this. It's pretty epic, in fact.
Since I've been working the other way and trying to go lighter/smaller, though, I think I'm going to sit out this one. But great job TB!!!!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: