Hi,
I'm considering an Aeronaut as my carry-on bag. I've been one-bagging (+ personal item) for a while, previously using a generic duffel bag and daypack. The duffel bag is closer to 3200 cu. in., but I've never been questioned (both overseas and domestic) since the material is very light and it looks unassuming. However, on my last trip to rome, I got a large rashes on my shoulders from carrying the duffel to/from bus stations and hotels. Thus, I'm looking for a bag to replace it. My travel is generally a mix of business (EE conferences) and pleasure.
Is the aeronaut intended for mile or two walks around towns while fully loaded? It looks tops aesthetically, but I noticed it lacked a waist-belt and compression straps. Also it didn't look like the zippers could lock adequately.
I've tried out two other pack's so far: Rick Steve's Convertible Carry-on and Osprey Porter 46. Despite the great reviews for rick steve's bag, I thought it carried horribly. It tended to flop around, bulge, did not transfer load adequately to waste belt, looked large when packed, lots of outside pockets for thieves to be curious about, and zipper didn't lock. (You could use a lock but it was easy to pull open)
I've spent a lot of time testing the Osprey Porter 46 and have been impressed so far. It is priced the same as Rick Steve's ($100) and weighs about the same (~ 3lbs), but it's suspension system was comfortable at 25 lbs. The framesheet stays stiff with the help of the compression system, so loads are transfered to the hip belt. Even though the hip belt is unpadded, it seemed comfortable. It also has load lifters, something I haven't seen on any other travel pack. There are only two external pockets, in addition to main compartment: a magazine pocket on the very back and a pouch pocket on the top. Both seem somewhat difficult for thieves to get to if it's on your back. The main compartment locks and I wasn't able to force the zipper open. On the inside of the main compartment are two flat mesh pockets, one across the side and one on the zippered flap.
However, some concern with the Porter: It looks like a cross between an oversized school backpack and a duffel bag. Has only one main compartment, which might make packing difficult (or easier, it'll fit an 18" eagle creek pack-it folder). Ends are tapered, which might reduce volume a little. Unsure about Osprey's travel pack quality (I know their outdoor backpacks are quite good). Does anyone have any comments about how this would compare to an Aeronaut? Is the Aeronaut's suspension optimized for around an airport, but not so much across town?
I'm considering an Aeronaut as my carry-on bag. I've been one-bagging (+ personal item) for a while, previously using a generic duffel bag and daypack. The duffel bag is closer to 3200 cu. in., but I've never been questioned (both overseas and domestic) since the material is very light and it looks unassuming. However, on my last trip to rome, I got a large rashes on my shoulders from carrying the duffel to/from bus stations and hotels. Thus, I'm looking for a bag to replace it. My travel is generally a mix of business (EE conferences) and pleasure.
Is the aeronaut intended for mile or two walks around towns while fully loaded? It looks tops aesthetically, but I noticed it lacked a waist-belt and compression straps. Also it didn't look like the zippers could lock adequately.
I've tried out two other pack's so far: Rick Steve's Convertible Carry-on and Osprey Porter 46. Despite the great reviews for rick steve's bag, I thought it carried horribly. It tended to flop around, bulge, did not transfer load adequately to waste belt, looked large when packed, lots of outside pockets for thieves to be curious about, and zipper didn't lock. (You could use a lock but it was easy to pull open)
I've spent a lot of time testing the Osprey Porter 46 and have been impressed so far. It is priced the same as Rick Steve's ($100) and weighs about the same (~ 3lbs), but it's suspension system was comfortable at 25 lbs. The framesheet stays stiff with the help of the compression system, so loads are transfered to the hip belt. Even though the hip belt is unpadded, it seemed comfortable. It also has load lifters, something I haven't seen on any other travel pack. There are only two external pockets, in addition to main compartment: a magazine pocket on the very back and a pouch pocket on the top. Both seem somewhat difficult for thieves to get to if it's on your back. The main compartment locks and I wasn't able to force the zipper open. On the inside of the main compartment are two flat mesh pockets, one across the side and one on the zippered flap.
However, some concern with the Porter: It looks like a cross between an oversized school backpack and a duffel bag. Has only one main compartment, which might make packing difficult (or easier, it'll fit an 18" eagle creek pack-it folder). Ends are tapered, which might reduce volume a little. Unsure about Osprey's travel pack quality (I know their outdoor backpacks are quite good). Does anyone have any comments about how this would compare to an Aeronaut? Is the Aeronaut's suspension optimized for around an airport, but not so much across town?
Comment