Welcome!

We're glad you are here. This is the place to ask for bag advice, help other people out, post reviews, and share photos and videos.

TOM BIHN Forums Statistics

Collapse

Topics: 14,583   Posts: 188,377   Members: 6,554   Active Members: 308
Welcome to our newest member, TuyetBooth.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Travel bag between Tri-Star and Aeronaut

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Travel bag between Tri-Star and Aeronaut

    I would really love to see a bag that falls between the Tri-Star and Aeronaut in size and functionality. I love the simple two-compartment design of the Western Flyer and would love to see a scaled up version.

    Ideally, the bag should be 21" x 15.5" x 7.5" to meet more restrictive European carry-on requirements and have a volume of approx. 40 liters / 2400 cu in. These dimensions may need to be tweaked to make this feasible (I recommend adding depth rather than length or height to allow travelers to compress their bag to meet requirements if needed), but the goal should be to meet the tightest carry-on requirements and still hit as near the 40 liters mark as possible. If you could mold the Western Flyer design to these dimensions at 38-40 liters, this would be the perfect bag.

    Tom Bihn Bags I've looked at:
    • Tom Bihn Wester Flyer - 18" x 12" x 7", 26 liters, great design but too small and never intended for extended travel.
    • Tom Bihn Tri-Star - 19" x 13" x 8", 33 liters, good design but a little too small for my needs.
    • Tom Bihn Aeronaut - 22" x 14" x 9", 45 liters, slightly too large and I'm looking for a fold-out design similar to Western Flyer and Tri-Star.

    Other bags I've looked at:
    • MEI Executive Overnighter - 22" x 14" x 9", 45 liters, slightly too large but otherwise a very good bag.
    • Red Oxx Sky Train - 20" x 13" x "9, 38 liters, almost ideal but dimensions could be tweaked slightly to take better advantage of carry-on requirements and backpack straps are well-known for their discomfort.
    • Red Oxx Air Boss - 21" x 13" x 8", 35 liters, slightly too small and dimensions could be tweaked slightly to take better advantage of carry-on requirements. Also, no backpack option.
    • Patagonia MLC - 20.5" x 13.5" x 4.5" (?), 45 liters (?), on paper almost the ideal bag but production quality has declined over the years and the dimensions / capacity listed on the website are questionable.

    I listed some other bags for informational purposes but I'm primarily focused on purchasing a bag from Tom Bihn. I have no immediate travel needs so I'm not in a big hurry, but I would like to see a Tom Bihn that meets my requirements. Similar suggestions have been submitted before, by myself and by others, but I'd love to hear if any plans have been made to fill this niche in the near future.

    PS. Has Tom Bihn ever considered providing some earth-tone color options such as olive or khaki? Where I travel black or grey is the only color option that Tom Bihn provides that would meet my requirements. Bright colors attract too much attention and show dirt too easily.
    Last edited by Novan Leon; 06-21-2010, 11:08 AM.

    #2
    The problem is you want a bag with "European" carry-on dimensions. That would limit the number of customers for a new bag to those outside the U.S.

    21 x 14 x 8 would be good for both U.S. and international carriers as it really doesn't go over any of the limits. Anything more on either the 14 or 8 and you go over carry-on limits.
    Editor--One Bag, One World: News, Reviews & Community for Light Travelers.

    Aeronaut(2), Tri-Star(2) Cadet , Large Cafe Bag, Travel Tray, Travel Money Belt, Absolute Straps(3), Side Effect, Clear Quarter Packing Cubes (2), 3D Organizer Cubes (4), Aeronaut & Tri-Star Packing Cubes, Clear Organizer Wallet, numerous Organizer Pouches,, Guardian Dual Function Light, Vertical Netbook Cache, Nexus 7 Cache, RFID Passport Pouch, numerous Key Straps.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by fbrown627 View Post
      The problem is you want a bag with "European" carry-on dimensions. That would limit the number of customers for a new bag to those outside the U.S.

      21 x 14 x 8 would be good for both U.S. and international carriers as it really doesn't go over any of the limits. Anything more on either the 14 or 8 and you go over carry-on limits.
      21" x 14" x 8" would be fine with me, but if additional volume is needed I just think it should be with the 8" since this could theoretically be compressed using straps or other means. You can't really alter a bags length or height without deforming the bag's structure.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Novan Leon View Post
        21" x 14" x 8" would be fine with me, but if additional volume is needed I just think it should be with the 8" since this could theoretically be compressed using straps or other means. You can't really alter a bags length or height without deforming the bag's structure.
        Just a note, those dimensions are 2352 cubic inches, or 38.54 liters. That's without adding in the volume of the bag material itself, so figure something like 37 liters.

        Comment


          #5
          Once upon a time I wrote a piece on here about European bag sizes, but to cut long short, the Aeronaut fits pretty much every Airline, so long as you remember their quirks. For example RyanAir only allow bags 20cm deep as opposed to the usual 25cm that the Aeronaut is built to, but, so long as you've not packed it too tight, it fits. FlyBe, area bit shorter in the longest dimension, but it can still fit if you've remembered this. EasyJet, BA and a few others are no problem. The real problem is weight. RyanAir are pretty strict on a 10KG limit, and one or two are even less. It's all too easy to go over 10Kg with an Aeronaut and even the 15Kg that they allow for a standard checked bag isn't much... an Aeronaut is 1.35Kg before you start. Add a lap-top at 2-3Kg and an iPad at 0.7 and half your allowance is gone before you even pack some spare smalls and a tooth brush! EasyJet on the other hand have no weight restrictions, so long as you can lift it in to the overhead bins unaided.

          Comment

          Working...
          X