A couple weeks ago, when browsing through color options on the page for some bag or other, I noticed that the listings for the 525 Ballistic color now read as just "[color] Ballistic," while the 1050 and 210 types kept the denier number. At the time, I didn't think much of it - perhaps just a confirmation that TB saw the mid-weight ballistic nylon as its "default" offering.
But then, as I was reading over the materials page last weekend, I saw this tidbit in the 525 Ballistic section:
Because there was already a 630 Recycled Nylon, I was curious about this switch-over. Each different fabric has colors specific to that fabric (and the 630 Recycled Nylon is no exception to that), but in this case, it sounds as though this new 630 will come in all the colors that 525 had, and so the transition will be pretty smooth. I am curious, though, about the reason for the changeover. Is there some sort of material advantage in that extra 105 Ds, or is this mainly a case of working around material/supply chain hitches? And how does this 630 compare to the recycled 630? My big hope is that this will somehow magically solve the unfortunate scuffing-with-light-use issue that I've witnessed a number of times in photos here, but that may be a bit of wishful thinking on my part. Still, as someone who tends to favor beefier fabrics, I'm totally in favor of a slightly heavier variant of the middleweight offering.
But then, as I was reading over the materials page last weekend, I saw this tidbit in the 525 Ballistic section:
"A note about the denier: we are beginning a transition from our 525d ballistic nylon to 630d ballistic nylon. They’re virtually the same fabrics — both high-tenacity yarns and even though 630d is ever so slightly heavier on paper, we can hardly feel it. 30d will offer us a continuously available supply (the base yarns will continue to be stocked by our mill) at an ever-so-slightly increased cost."
Comment